Legal Ethics Forum: Backlash to MR. 8.4(g)

Legal Ethics Forum: Backlash to MR. 8.4(g):

There is a new proposal in the ABA to modify Rule 8.4(g) as follows:

It shall be professional misconduct for a lawyer to engage in conduct that the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is harassment or discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status or socioeconomic status in conduct related to the practice of law. This paragraph does not limit the ability of a lawyer to accept, decline or withdraw from a representation in accordance with Rule 1.16. This paragraph does not preclude legitimate advice or advocacy consistent with these Rules.


As one might imagine, the Rule has unleashed a firestorm of criticism on the ground that it mandates political correctness and that it represses free speech.


I’m not a fan of this Rule and would encourage everyone to read the excellent criticisms on the Volokh Conspiracy Blog.

‘via Blog this’

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s